![]()
|
19 June 2005 2:01 a.m. when i upload pictures to friendster, these two websites popped up. wtf invasiveness! does it mean tabs are being kept on the users? we've just had unwelcome visitors - two guys came and tapped insistently on the gate with a pen till i went to the door. if there's anything more obnoxious than persistent tapping on a metal gate, it's Jessica Simpson's new video. tapping pisses off your neighbour's dogs too, and their barking annoys me even further. so, the guy with the pen says something, but is drowned out by the dogs (dude, you're not very popular, get a clue and LEAVE please). it sounds like, "*drowned out by the dogs*... can you come out?" HELL NO. didn't your mother tell you anything about talking to strangers? the following ensued (the man started off speaking cantonese and i spoke malay all the way) - A = me A: what you want? end. now - 1. who would want to inspect gas tanks, and why? ** door-to-door strangers always ask this question - "is this a chinese/indian/malay/muslim/christian house?" i don't see what bearing it has on anything, considering we're all countrymen and shit. besides, you don't need to be chinese to have geomancy items around your house. anyway, fuck you, you door-to-door strangers. *** this is a very obvious ploy to gain entry into a house to rob/rape/both/vandalise the gas pipe so that the house-owner has to buy a new (and very overpriced) one from the cheat. i wanted to step away from the PC for a moment and i wanted to type "brb!". the thing is, i didn't have any chat programs open at the time. pretentious instalment #732980472 - a lyric from Bleed Like Me is like a half-remembered dream (every thing you thought you know, baby, is wrong; every thing you thought you have, baby, is gone... and so forth). now i expect a malaysia square if i ever go to the UAE. two states have agreed with the proposal to hand out free condoms and needles to drug addicts, but only to married Muslim drug addicts. way to alienate the rest of the group, you geniuses. how many drug addicts are married in the first place? well, okay, how many of them stay married? there's no telling. this calls for an in-depth study, with contracts and money and shit. i read a blog entry where the writer was indignant over people getting cheated in some roadside game. he wrote that someone should call the police. do it yourself, you fucking wanker. i wonder about The Guts Effect - has the reader himself ever fainted while reading it aloud? story here (DO NOT EAT WHILE READING THIS) (by Chuck Palahniuk - now you know what to expect. sort of). cathartic-type malarkey
yesterday, fanfiction.net sent me an e-mail, notifying me of a review one of my stories had received. the reviewer regretted that i hadn't written anything else after that. to my surprise, i agreed with her. it's also pretty cool being compared to Yusof Haslam, and knowing that my fic kicks his "fic" to the kerb (yes, i know who Yusof Haslam is). all this time, i thought i'd only lost interest in the matter. however, the shameful truth is that i've just been too lazy to write an actual proper story-type thing with a plot and character development and shit. plus, everyone just wants to read plot what plots (PWP) anyway. but really, making an effort at anything wasn't something i wanted to do at the time. *cue non sequitur rationalising of laziness to fill up space* i suppose the fandom turned me off it in some ways, although fanfiction is a means of relating to the canon with other fans. still, the fangirling turned me off (yes, i know i'm guilty of it too, but i have a point here somewhere). well, okay, i don't know really. i think my inherent loner-ism made me leave when the fandom became larger. everyone wants to feel special. 14 June 2005 1:21 p.m.*thwap* please, all of you, stop doing cover versions. has anyone seen Jessica Simpson's cover of These Boots Are Made For Walking? and, erm, the JS site has some song thing going on when the page loads, so speakers off, people! angela, you cry, you wrote 'seen' instead of 'heard'! surely you're mistaken! no, i am not. i am never mistaken. not even when i am presented with a picture of Christian Bale wearing nothing but his BatGloves (tm). Suze, you shouldn't watch it because you might break something in outrage - i've never seen so much self-whoring since the last time i saw a i wish i'd switched the sound off because she's whinier than Britney Spears and looks sluttier than Christina Aguilera, but i am a masochist; and i would't have this post if it weren't for her and her bright red, dust-dusted calf-length hooker boots, glossy gaping mouth and desperate, predatory eyes. also, madam, that is the absolute worst catwalk i have ever seen. if you must insist on being all in our face like that, the least you could do is do it right. Janice Dickinson would like a word with you. do you think i'd write a retraction of an earlier post if i were to listen to Out Of Exile again? Manolo's shoe blog. Manolo rules. p.s. i just wanted to write "Christian Bale wearing nothing but his BatGloves (tm)" really badly. excuse me. 09 June 2005 11:16 p.m. i ![]() "we'll be free of this one day, fellas." how not to spend your school holidays
i hope the reader would have, by now, caught on to the message, otherwise i would just have to go over there and hit you one more time, which is something i don't want to do again, okay? the french movie festival is going on right now! ad hoc censorship will take place where appropriate. the audience may feel free to interact as they see fit with the sounds of a building female orgasm (but cannot see), because loud moaning, gasping and squealing and creaking bedsprings don't turn me on at all, oh no. seriously, while Les Choristes was fabulous and elegant in its heartfelt simplicity, you'll have to watch If I Were A Rich Man (Ah! Si J'étais Riche) if you want to see the heaving bosom of one Valeria Bruni-Tedeschi, who doesn't look at all like Gillian Andersen. p.s. - there was a bookfair at megamall as well. the Nanyang Siang Pau had an exhibit on photos that were never published because the editor considered them too gruesome for the public. among them were pictures of an elephant with its trunk sawn off, and various accident victims bloodied and broken in death.the thing is, why show them now, or at all? it was horrible and everyone who viewed them was hushed and came away feeling subdued; but there was no empathy, just guilt that we were all in a thrall of ghoulish, voyeuristic fascination.07 June 2005 1:21 p.m.see here now alumna! (aside from the comments, naturally) ok, i and - The Music! their second album (Welcome to the North) is out now, though it burns a hole in your pocket. it's better than Audioslave though. 04 June 2005 10:37 p.m.a green grocer's revenge: tales from the crypt edition
well, it's more memorable than listening to Audioslave coming Out Of Exile. why can Adam Levine of Maroon5 sound like both Jay Kay Jamiroquai and Erykah Badu, yet not sound as derivative? why can Good Charlotte get away with pulling a U2 while you don't? because i loved the first album, it is thus very hard for me to admit that the second album isn't very good. in fact, i will steel myself to say that it's only marginally average. sure, the first single - Be Yourself, is stuck in everyone's head right now, but how much of it is due to sheer brilliance, as opposed to relentless airplay and a very nice video where they look all muso and i mean seriously, you're supposed to be a supergroup - you're not supposed to sound like a watered down Pearl Jam (we had that there is a lot of bombast on the album, yet it's as if the band doesn't have the same conviction as before. while it's true that Tom is still brilliant, even his solos sound dated and, dare i say it, predictable. after the initial shock of dismay had worn off, it degenerated into a game of "how many influences can you spot in one song?" if there was a name-check track, you can be sure that Placebo and Bon Jovi would be included among the likes of random country and western singers. i fast forwarded my way through the album, desperately searching for something to latch on to, and i'm a person who listened to the whole AFI album (i forgot which one) before never playing it again. while there were a few bright spots, e.g. Man Or Animal, The Worm (which comes perilously close to having points deducted because of the pretentious sounding title), it is ultimately, a formulaic album, and therefore miserably generic. on the bright side (maybe), it would be a good candidate for the soundtrack to the blockbuster-type movie most malaysians fancy. on the other hand, it means that nothing on the album is even remotely memorable.i am very upset. this is something Papa Roach would concoct, not you rock monster types. unless you've aged and become rock dinosaurs. the album has dismayed me more than i know, and it shows - this entry is the worst piece of crap i've ever written. i hear Jamiroquai have a new album out - it's called Dynamite. it'd better be.
|